From the Telegraph
Phil Woolas: what the judges said
Two High Court judges today ordered a re-run of this year's General Election campaign over Phil Woolas' Oldham East and Saddleworth seat.
Mr Woolas was accused of fighting a 'dirty and dishonest' campaign full of 'lies, smears and totally false allegations' Photo: GETTY
Mr Justice Teare said: "In an election address entitled The Examiner, the respondent (Mr Woolas) made a statement of fact, the meaning of which was that the petitioner attempted to woo, that is to seek, the electoral support of Muslims who advocated violence, in particular violence to the respondent.
"In a further election address entitled Labour Rose, he made a statement of fact the meaning of which was that the petitioner had refused to condemn extremists who advocated violence against the respondent.
"We have concluded that both of these statements, although made in the context of an election and said to arise from a political position adopted by the petitioner, were in relation to the petitioner's personal character or conduct.
"In our judgment to say that a person has sought the electoral support of persons who advocate extreme violence, in particular to his personal opponent, clearly attacks his personal character or conduct.
"It suggests that he is willing to condone threats of violence in pursuit of personal advantage.
"Having considered the evidence which was adduced in court we are sure that these statements were untrue. We are also sure that the respondent had no reasonable grounds for believing them to be true and did not believe them to be true.
"We also found that (in) an earlier election address the respondent had made a statement in fact, namely, that the petitioner had reneged on his promise to live in the constituency. This too, although made in the context of an election and said to arise from a statement made by the petitioner as a candidate in that election, was in relation to his personal character or conduct.
"It suggests that he is untrustworthy. The statement was false and the respondent had no reasonable ground for believing it to be true and did not believe it to be true.
"It follows in our judgment that the respondent is guilty of an illegal practice, contrary to section 136 of the Representation of the People Act 1983 with regard to those statements."
He concluded: "The consequence of our finding that the respondent is guilty of an illegal practice with regard to the statements we have referred to is that, pursuant to section 159(1) of the Act, his election as Member of Parliament for the constituency of Oldham East and Saddleworth is void and we have so reported to the Speaker of the House of Commons.
"We are satisfied that the statutory penalties for the illegal practices committed by the respondent are both necessary and proportionate, having regard to the seriousness of the statements made with regard to the petitioner's alleged attitude to the Muslim extremists who advocated violence."
The judges made no reference to the sanctions on Mr Woolas, although it is thought he could be barred from public office for a period of time.
From the Daily Mail
The court remains in session as the judges deliberate on costs and Mr Woolas's plans to launch a judicial review of the decision.By-election ordered as Labour Minister 'who stirred racial tensions' is barred from the Commons for three years
By DAILY MAIL REPORTER
Last updated at 2:42 PM on 5th November 2010
Last updated at 2:42 PM on 5th November 2010
- Phil Woolas barred from the Commons for 3 years
- Former Labour minister won election by just 103 votes
- Decision is first ruling of its kind in 99 years
- Coalition to decide if both parties will field candidates
Former immigration minister Phil Woolas lost his seat as an MP today after an election court ruled that he knowingly made false statements about an opponent in May's general election.
The Labour MP is to be barred from the Commons for three years and the election contest for his Oldham East and Saddleworth seat re-run.
A potentially awkward by-election now looms for the coalition which will need to decide if both the Lib Dems and Tories will field candidates in the re-run.
The specially convened election court had heard that the Labour MP stirred up racial tensions in a desperate bid to retain his seat.
His campaign team was said to have set out to 'make the white folk angry' by depicting an alleged campaign by Muslims to 'take Phil out'.
Victory: Elwyn Watkins and Lib Dem deputy leader Simon Hughes at Saddleworth civic centre near Oldham today
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1326930/Election-ex-Labour-MP-Phil-Woolas-stirred-racial-tensions-declared-void.html#ixzz14Q5d4MkC
SEE BLOG POSTING Monday 13th September in the Archives
1 comment:
Couldn't have happened to a nicer man.
As Last of the Few pointed out, it is ironic that the Immigration shadow (and ex-minister) shouldbe a racist.
The Commons will be a better place with this figure of fun.
Post a Comment