Click on a pic and watch the flick

Loading...

Tuesday, 9 February 2010

Support from Independence-minded Scots


From Richard Thomson

Tuesday, February 09, 2010


A 'Yes' for Wales

Some important news from Wales which you almost certainly won't have seen on our glorious British 'national' news. This evening, the Senedd passed a motion which triggers the process for a referendum to be held on transferring legislative powers to the institution from Westminster. The motion, which required the support of at least 40 AMs, succeeded in garnering the support of 53 in the end, with no abstentions or votes against.



And so begins a process which will see First Minister Carwyn Jones write to Secretary of State, Peter Hain, informing him of the result. The Secretary of State then has 120 days in which to consider the request, and lay a draft order for the referendum, or to respond in the negative explaining why a vote can't go ahead.

A rejection seems highly unlikely. Hain has already said this evening that he looks forward to “beginning the preparatory work”. His Conservative shadow, Cheryl Gillan, has also made it clear that the Tories, should they win the general election in the meantime, will not stand in the way of a referendum. Plaid Cymru, as you would expect, are in favour, while for the Lib Dems, Kirsty Williams has argued that the present settlement is “unsustainable”.

There's no doubting the progress that the self-government argument has made in Wales since the knife edge referendum result in 1997. I stayed up to watch the results coming in that evening, and went to bed in the wee small hours, despondent that the 'No' campaign looked to have won the day. In the event, it took the final declaration from Carmarthenshire to swing it. Seldom has a student hangover disappeared quite so quickly!

The argument for the transfer of legislative powers ought to be unanswerable. The current system whereby Legislative Competence Motions have to be passed in order to give the Senedd powers to legislate on particular matters, is clunky and cumbersome. However, the challenge, at a time of cynicism about politics and politicians, is to set this in a context and narrative which resonates with people. Done properly, and with the cross party support already in evidence, it can give the Senedd, and indeed the whole idea of self-government for Wales, the emphatic legitimising endorsement that so many loud voices have always sought to deny the institution.

While I wish my many Welsh friends and colleagues likely to be involved in the 'Yes' campaign all the best, it's hard not to draw a parallel with Scotland. Here, we're told by our regional franchises of Labour, the Conservatives and the Lib Dems that a referendum on the constitution is no-go. Thanks to this evening's vote in the Commons on electoral reform, that's two referendums which now have the go-ahead to take place during an economic downturn, when people's minds are focused on [insert own self-serving excuse here].

It really shouldn't need to be pointed out, but the legitimacy of our political processes and their ability to respond to people's concerns has arguably never been more important. It's not just about who governs or how they govern, but also the ability we have to influence how we ourselves are governed. Here's to a successful referendum in Wales, and to a similarly successful vote on Independence in the not too distant future.

Hunkered down bunkered Brown


All set for the election debacle

British PM to face Iraq inquiry in early March
LONDON — British Prime Minister Gordon Brown will appear before the public inquiry into the Iraq war in early March, a spokesman for the probe said on Tuesday.
Brown was finance minister at the time of the 2003 US-led invasion, and is being called to give his account of the conflict several weeks after then prime minister Tony Blair gave his long-awaited evidence on January 29.


Times Online

Gordon Brown was accused today of sending troops to war in Iraq and Afghanistan without proper equipment and of causing long-term damage to the Armed Forces by “guillotining” defence spending.
Defence chiefs were forced to reduce manpower and to cut projects for aircraft, ships and armoured vehicles just six months after the invasion or Iraq and while British troops were also serving in Afghanistan.
The claims came as a former Defence Secretary said that the relatives of those killed in Iraq will not find “closure” while they continue to believe that the war was a conspiracy by Tony Blair’s Government.
Sir Kevin Tebbit, the Ministry of Defence’s top civil servant at the time of the invasion, told the official Iraq Inquiry that Mr Brown “arbitrarily” ordered the cuts in spending.

Voting for the Referendum



Historic day.
Today – February 9th – is a historic day. Remember this date because assembly Members will cast their vote to begin the process of holding a referendum. The end of the complex and cumbersome status quo of the LCO process is in sight, and we look forward to supporting the ‘yes’ campaign.


AMs expected today to vote in favour of a referendum

AN OVERWHELMING majority of AMs are today expected to vote in favour of asking the people of Wales if the Assembly should have new freedoms to make laws in the areas for which it has responsibility.
The Conservative group will hold a meeting this morning to discuss how its members will vote this afternoon but strong support is anticipated.
First Minister Carwyn Jones is confident the 40 votes needed to trigger a referendum request will be obtained.
He said in a statement: “Today, we are on the threshold of yet another significant step forward in bringing decision- making closer to the people of Wales. In today’s plenary vote, the Assembly Government will be seeking the support of AMs from all parties, to begin the process of moving towards a referendum.
“I am confident we can obtain the support we need to take this forward.”
The goal of holding a referendum on law-making powers on or before the 2011 election was a key element of the deal which united Labour and Plaid Cymru in the One Wales coalition government.
Plaid leader and Deputy First Minister Ieuan Wyn Jones said: “The time has come to move Wales forward and to pave the way for the National Assembly to make its own laws without having to first seek the approval of MPs in Westminster. This is how it works in Scotland and Northern Ireland and we are no less capable here in Wales of making good laws in the interest of our communities.”
He continued: “For most citizens in Wales, frustrated by the limits of the current system, holding a referendum on more law-making powers is simply a matter of common sense.”
Last week the Conservatives and the Liberal Democrats threatened to abstain if the Assembly Government left open the option of a poll on the day of the 2011 elections. However, the difficulties a combination of votes would cause have now been acknowledged.
Tomorrow’s Wales, a group which campaigns for a more powerful Assembly, said a cross-party vote in favour of the referendum would be “brilliant news”.
Archbishop Barry Morgan, who chairs Tomorrow’s Wales, said: “This means that AMs have put the needs of the people before party politics. It sets the scene for the consensus-building approach that can deliver a resounding Yes vote in the forthcoming referendum.”
At present, the Assembly Government can request law-making powers in specific areas to be transferred from Westminster through Legislative Competence Orders. A Yes vote in the referendum would give the Assembly the freedom to make laws in 20 areas.
Liberal Democrat AM Eleanor Burnham said that even if the referendum was won, the Assembly would still need a fairer system of funding.
However, she said: “The more we can do for ourselves and the quicker we can do it the better.”
Conservative Assembly leader Nick Bourne opposed devolution in the 1997 referendum yet is now a leading supporter of a Yes vote.
He said: “We really need to convince people this isn’t going to be a costly exercise. This should really be cost-neutral.”
He said he had been gradually convinced that the Assembly should have powers which would allow it to set rules for school bus safety and have control over tuition fees.
Acknowledging that his support for more powers was not unanimously shared among Conservatives, he said: “I wasn’t flavour of the month with every quarter of the party, it’s fair to say. There are always those people who don’t believe in the world according to Bourne.”
However, he was confident his party would back a public vote on the issue, saying: “Most of us in the group want extra devolution but all of us I think want a referendum to decide the issue.”
He does not expect there to be strong demand for further stages of devolution in the future. “I think this will be the last major step.”
Former Plaid Cymru leader Dafydd Wigley said his party had learned that devolution does not take place with one “big bang” but is a gradual process.
He said: “This isn’t a massive, radical step... [It] is allowing the Assembly to do what it can already do through a slow process by a more efficient and effective process.”
Looking forward to today’s vote, he said, “I hope everybody will vote in favour. I’d be very disappointed if anybody voted against.”
He favours an October 2010 referendum, providing there is not a second Westminster election around this time as a result of a hung parliament.
Mr Wigley does not expect “revolutionary” new powers to come to the Assembly in the near future, but he believes it may gain responsibilities for new subjects.
He has not yet decided whether he will seek to rejoin the Assembly in 2011.
“I’m waiting until after the Westminster election,” he said. “I’m holding back till then.”
Rachel Banner of True Wales, a group opposed to the Assembly gaining new powers, looked forward to a referendum.
She said: “The only thing we are concerned about now is we get a fair question. If it isn’t a fair question, it will bring the whole process into disrepute.”
Ms Banner hopes that a debate about how Wales should be governed will help end public disengagement from politics.
Helen Mary Jones, deputy leader of the Plaid Assembly group, said: “‘No’ campaigners seem determined to try and create the impression that this referendum is about independence when clearly it isn’t. They have either completely misunderstood the nature of this vote or they’re trying to intentionally mislead the people of Wales.”
Another referendum in the offing: 


http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programmes/bbc_parliament/7355245.stm






The issue of how to pay the care costs for England's ageing population looks set to be a key battleground during the election campaign. Scotland already has free personal care.

Monday, 8 February 2010

Mc Guinness Statement - northern Ireland








McGuinness welcomes agreement
 Speaking  at  Hillsborough this morning at the announcement of a deal on
 the  transfer of policing and justice powers from London to the North of
  Ireland Sinn Féin MP and Deputy First Minister Martin McGuinness said:
  “Cuirim  fáilte  roimh  an  Taoiseach,  Príomh Aire na Breataine agus na
  páirtí uilig.
  “I  am  very pleased that we have concluded this agreement with the DUP.
  As everyone knows this has been a difficult negotiation.  This is hardly
  a  surprise  given  the reality that I am an Irish Republican and others
  here  have  a  completely different view. I believe in a united Ireland.
  They want to maintain the union with England.
  “This should not mean that we are incapable of respecting each other, of
  treating   one  another  as  equals  and  proceeding  on  the  basis  of
  partnership,  respect, fairness and equality. I am utterly determined to
  continue  to  work  in good faith and with a good heart with my unionist
  colleagues.  I  want to work in harmony with Peter Robinson for the good
  of the entire community.
  “That  is  what  Sinn Féin is about. We signed up for agreements on Good
  Friday  and  at  St.  Andrews and here today. We proceed on the basis of
  implementing these commitments.
  “We  have agreed that the transfer of policing and justice powers to our
  power  sharing government will happen on April 12th.  We have agreed and
  put  in  place a process which will see the powers which oversee parades
  transfer to our administration before the end of this year.
  “We  have  agreed  a  process  to  progress the rights of Irish Language
  speakers  and  North/South  aspects  of the St. Andrews Agreement.  Sinn
  Féin are in these political institutions to deliver for everyone. That’s
  what  Sinn  Féin Ministers and MLAs are here to do.  I am a Minister for
  all citizens.
  “We are also agreed on the need to deliver for our community, it is what
  they expect.  There are families and children living in poverty; elderly
  people  feeling  vulnerable  and  in  fear.   There  are  young families
  burdened  by massive mortgages and in fear of losing their homes; people
  without jobs.
  “Our government needs to reach out to these people. It needs to deliver.
  We  need to confront and defeat all kinds of hatred. With determined and
  courageous  leadership  we must continue to lead that shrinking minority
  out  of  the  trenches  of  the  past.  In this I am confident we can be
  assured  of  the  support of the vast majority of our people. We need to
  make life better for all our children and grandchildren.
  “That  is  what  this agreement must mean in practice. Fully functioning
  political  institutions  operated for the people in true partnership and
  equality.  Let  us  now  all  face  into  the  future with confidence in
  ourselves and in the people who elect us.” ENDS




Five More Years of Labour - a Deadly Scenario?

What would Britain look like after another five years of Labour government?



Click to enlarge the pic

1) A highly multi-racial society with a large percentage of citizens residing overseas?
2) A highly taxed socialist society to support state services - the NHS, education, the police?
3) Identity cards and a national DNA data-base with all personal details of every citizen?
4) Freedom of speech restricted by widespread imposition of political correctness?
5) Police given wide-ranging powers of arrest and detention and a clamp-down on dissent?
6) Increased powers for the cabinet and more bureaucracy and state control?
7) Expansion of the civil service and state surveillance operatives?
8) An increase of job opportunities in the state sector at the expense of the private sector?
9) The virtual extinction of nuclear family life with more same-sex "marriages".?
10)Fines and penalties enforced for minor infringement of local laws and regulations?

There are people who might be content to live in this kind of highly regulated society where individual differences are frowned on and individual thought is discouraged, and where everything is predictable and stereotyped. They are not the readers of this blog.

Sunday, 7 February 2010

Celtic Woman - A New Journey - Spanish Lady



SOON TO BE ON MY WAY - BACK TO IRELAND, AND COMMON SENSE

Last Resort? Labour and the Waterworks

See THIS





As Election Day approaches Labour politicians turn emotional in a last desperate appeal for the sympathies of the British public. Who will be the next? Watch the Andrew Marr Show, Daily Politics or Sunday Live for more heart-rendering scenes and eye-watering confessions.


Now THIS


One commenter has suggested that a Labour politician carries around raw onions in his pocket. However, we don't want to give them ideas.


"Bad Al is also said to have groomed Gordon Brown for his Piers Morgan interview, where he too tears up and gets emotional. Are they going for the sympathy vote?  Three months before the election Brown is blubbing for the cameras, having always claimed he was a private man and criticising Cameron (and by implication Blair) for doing the touchy-feely stuff.  Are they trying to fake up some kind of emotional connection with voters to compensate at the last minute for Gordon’s lack of EQ?"


Guido Fawkes' blog

New SDLP Leader Elected


The SDLP is the second nationalist party in the north of Ireland after Sinn Fein. Now it has a new leader in Margaret Ritchie to champion the cause of civil rights in Ireland. Both parties work for the unification of Ireland but are opposed by the Democratic Unionist Party and the Unionist Party which believe in retaining the connection with Britain. All parties are committed to power sharing according to the Friday Agreement, partly because a breakdown would bring about the possibility of communal strife, a scenario too awful to contemplate.
The nationalist parties seek to bring about a healing process which will inevitably lead to union with the Republic now that the devolution of powers from Westminster reaches its conclusion.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/northern_ireland/8502721.stm

Click HERE

Hundreds of Irish people from the South drive into the North of Ireland every day to do their shopping as goods are cheaper in the sterling area. The time has come for northern Ireland to adopt the Euro.

Tighter Regulations After 10 Years of Labour Inaction


The Telegraph

'Thousands' of bogus UK students

Degree
There were calls for tighter controls of colleges
There could be tens of thousands of bogus students in the UK, who entered before the tightening of student visa regulations, MPs have been told.
College leaders told the home affairs select committee they had been warning about bogus colleges for a decade.
The lack of control over colleges had been a "national scandal," said Tony Millins, head of language teaching association English UK.
Immigration Minister Phil Woolas said such loopholes had now been closed.
The committee of MPs heard evidence on bogus colleges - which are often institutions set up as a cover for immigration fraud.


The Independent



We got it wrong on immigration, says Johnson




By Nigel Morris, Deputy Political Editor
Tuesday, 3 November 2009










The Home Secretary admitted yesterday the Government had made serious mistakes over immigration and in the aftermath of the 7 July bombings. Alan Johnson confessed Labour had been "maladroit" in its handling of immigration and accepted ministers had ignored for "far too long" the problems that led to a backlog of 450,000 unprocessed claims.
Mr Johnson also acknowledged parts of Britain were struggling to cope. In his first speech on the subject, he said: "There are communities which have been disproportionately affected by immigration, where people have legitimate concerns about the strain that the growth in the local population has placed on jobs and services."
He argued progress was being made, saying: "While I accept that governments of both persuasions, including this one, have been maladroit in their handling of this issue, I do believe that the UK is now far more successful at tackling immigration than most of its European and North American neighbours."
His comments mark a striking change of tone. Only recently, Mr Johnson insisted he did not "lie awake at night" worrying about Britain's population reaching 70 million. The Home Secretary also conceded that some anti-terror proposals, such as the detention of suspects for up to 90 days without trial, had gone too far. "That probably was an understandable feeling: that we should be more draconian. But perhaps that wasn't the right way to go," he said.


Comment: a glaring example of how Labour got it wrong, but there is a sneaking suspicion that it might have been intended for immigration to increase.
Another unpopular ministry in the government, geared up to waste money, is the ministry for ID cards, now voluntary at present but the original plan was to make them compulsory.

Saturday, 6 February 2010

Lib Dems - the New Party for the Poor


The Liberal Democrats have taken over the role from Labour as the "party for the poor". It was always the Labour Part which championed the working class poor in British society (when Britain was a society in which the class divisions were clearly demarcated). Since the emergence of New Labour, or even before that when the socialist wing of Michael Foot ceased to have relevance in British politics, Labour has moved farther to the right and one could argue that there is now little difference between the two major parties as they compete to control the centre ground. They are both the party of the "middle class".

The Liberal Democrats have perceived this situation and their strategy is now to support the deprived elements in society, namely the old and the poor. The Liberals would like to be seen as a caring party and to bring back fairness and justice to those former Labour supporters who are turning away from their traditional voting patterns. They are hoping to make inroads into the core Labour vote and promote themselves as the party which can bring fairness to the tax system, mitigate the effects of capitalism on ordinary people and assist the elderly.

However, as far as Wales and Scotland are concerned the Lib Dems are a unionist party. They serve the interests of Britain and more particularly, England. In Wales they appear to be backpedalling on the date of the Referendum for a Welsh Parliament in the fear that "it may be defeated in the vote". Indications show that the vote for the establishment of a proper Parliament for Wales will succeed, so it appears that these so-called fears are groundless. In Scotland, the Liberals debated whether or not to support the SNP in their mission for independence for Scotland, then withdrew from this position. There are obviously divisions within the Liberal camp which are revealed in their bewildering twists and turns and their inability to produce a positive plan. They are hampered by the Conservatives' predisposition to take over their best ideas and make them their own.

They would gain more respect and support if they came out strongly  for democratic rights such as the reform of the House of Lords or its replacement, as well as a constitutional solution - independence for Scotland and northern Ireland and a Parliament for Wales would be a start and a move in the right direction.

Now see THIS, and now THIS
Doubleclick image to enlarge



Friday, 5 February 2010

Baby Boomers Will Show Labour The Door

Opinion



http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/this-britain/baby-boomers-defiantly-refuse-to-grow-old-552853.html


The present Labour government has ignored the plight of the pensioners and those approaching pensionable age. These are the baby boomers, born during and after the Second World War who refuse to grow old (see link) and yet are now considered unemployable, partly because of the lack of employment, partly because of the recession and partly because of age discrimination, which is an unacknowledged reality.


These are the feisty people who have been slighted by this government and will show the door to New Labour by with-holding their vote or voting for a party which cares for their predicament. People of this generation are offended by having to prove their impoverished status by means of a means test and are reluctant to be obliged to claim Pension Credit. Many of them refuse to do so. The government has gained from those who have not claimed.


After having spent their lives industriously and conscientiously performing their duty for society and endeavouring to support their families, and striving to put away what little they can afford to ensure their survival into a lengthy retirement, they also suffer the indignity of being required to pay tax on their basic state pension allowances.


British pensions are by far the lowest in the European Union and do not cover the necessities of life in the 21st century. They ensure basic survival and nothing more, yet there are many other expenses requisite for a full and active life. It is as if the attitude of those in government consigns the elderly to history while they are still among us - the forgotten people of British politics. "From the cradle to the grave" was once a proud boast of Labour but no longer does it live up to its socialist expectations.


This is why I suggest that the baby boomers will consign the Labour government to history and vote en masse for parties which do not practise these discriminatory policies. Plaid Cymru is one of the parties which has advanced the pensioners' cause and brought their plight to the front of the public's attention, another is the SNP. In Wales and Scotland it is the nationalist parties, radical and communitarian, who have taken over the socialist mantle and displayed sympathy and concern for the elderly, once held is respect, but now spurned and largely ignored.


Plaid Cymru believes that Pension Credit should be included in the State Retirement Pension and then everyone gets it automatically - £35 a week would make a massive difference to the lives of those people currently not getting Pension Credit. Just because those of a different generation who are in charge of passing legislation are not directly affected by the pension problem this should not be an excuse for not attending to the needs of the socially impaired.





Thursday, 4 February 2010

Are New Labour Elitists the New Crachachs in Wales?



Looking for some exercise before the Wales England Rugby game on Saturday?!

 What about leaflet distribution in Llanelli and Aberconwy?






Nick Cohen implies that New Labour are the New Crachachs







People loathe Labour's elitists, not toffs

Never underestimate the resentment of the English middle class for the people who once called themselves their 'betters'. It storms through English literature from Defoe via Dickens to Kingsley Amis who had Lucky Jim mutter under his breath: 'You wordy old, turdy old scum, you griping old, piping old bum' at the privileged and conceited Professor Welch. Admittedly Amis wrote Lucky Jim before he switched from left to right, but then middle-class resentment of what we used to call the establishment has always been as strong on the right as the left.
Few socialist agitators could match the scorn of Margaret Thatcher for the Tory grandees she blamed for appeasing the unions in the Seventies as surely as their predecessors had appeased Hitler in the Thirties. When she came to power, she found it 'passionately interesting that the things that I learned in a small town, in a very modest home, are just the things that I believe have won the election'.
No effortless superiority or metropolitan sophistication there from a Prime Minister who, as Harold Macmillan said, preferred Estonians to Etonians. In that, Thatcher was typical of a deep strain in the English middle class. On the right and the left, it used to believe that distinction could only come with work and 'effortless superiority' was an oxymoron. Given that the old guard has seized back control of the Conservative party from Thatcher's grammar-school boys, it is worth wondering why hardly anyone is stirred by Labour's attacks on the new breed of 'Tory toffs'.
You will find part of the explanation the next time you read one of the 'when I was at Oxford I hated the Bullingdon Club' articles, which have taken permanent residence in the pages of the liberal press. You can guarantee that the outraged journalist or Labour politician was not at Oxford because they were working on the assembly line at Cowley. When they say 'I was at Oxford', they mean they were living in the same colleges and listening to the same tutors as Boris Johnson and David Cameron. They just moved in different social circles.
Freud's narcissism of small differences can power great hatreds and I have no doubt that the rage at the return of the Etonians is sincere. I feel it myself, while realising that these are tensions within a tiny and privileged part of British society.
If Cameron had taken control of the Conservatives a decade ago, I'm sure the party would have been in trouble, not just with the leftish upper-middle class but the wider population. In all probability, class conflict looms for Cameron after an election victory.
The disgust of middle-class Tories at the decision of their public-school leadership not to allow the building of grammar schools that might compete with the private sector showed that the division on the right between meritocrats and aristocrats remains as deep as it was in Eighties.
But for Labour to try to pick at it now makes no sense for a reason Cherie Blair mentioned at the height of her husband's ascendancy. 'Whoever is calling the shots in this country,' she declared triumphantly, 'it isn't the people on the grouse moors.'
Indeed not. Labour has been marching through the institutions for 11 years. With the exception of the armed forces, it has not allowed one state body to stay in the hands of natural conservatives. The Church of England, the BBC, the judiciary, the senior Civil Service, the trusts, agencies and quangos all have a pinkish hue. Even chief constables sound like Harriet Harman.
You can't run as an anti-elitist when you are part of the elite. You can only argue that you and your kind are best qualified to govern the country. Labour could make their case when Mrs Blair was gloating and Britain was booming. When hard times come, voters blame the people in power for their troubles, not 'the people on the grouse moor'. The old ruling class has been out for so long it no longer frightens voters, while Labour's jeers strike them as a cynical distraction from the enveloping economic crisis.
Cynical is the word for it, I'm afraid, although 'dunderheaded' and 'seedy' would do just as well. In London, Labour dredged through its student book of stereotypes and decided that because Boris Johnson was a 'toff' he had to be a 'racist'.
Although ethnic minority voters and public-sector workers bought the spin, the white working class revolted against the harping on race and Labour's decision to increase their taxes on the eve of a recession. Council estates that had never voted for a Tory joined with suburbia in turning to Johnson.
Having tried to play the racist card in London, Labour tried to play the race card in Crewe and Nantwich. If the problem with Johnson was that he was a 'racist toff', Labour decided that the problem with Edward Timpson was that he was a toff who had proved he wasn't racist enough when he opposed Gordon Brown's plans to force foreigners to carry ID. (The accusation wasn't true, strictly speaking - Labour wants all of us to carry its cards. But little of what Labour has been saying this year has been true, strictly speaking.)
After the last week's humiliation, MPs are talking about sacking Brown. For what it's worth, I don't think a palace revolution would help.
To impose two unelected Prime Ministers on a free country in little more than a year is the work of a party of true aristos that no longer respects the sovereign votes of a democracy and, as importantly, is prepared to waste months on a contest while a dread about the future takes hold.
Labour would do better to realise that millions of working- and middle-class people who can't see the subtle social differences between Ed Balls's private school and George Osborne's are lying awake and wondering if the ground is shifting from under them.
They are sweating about debt, unemployment, repossession, pensions and inflation. Old Etonians are the least of their problems.

The Crachach - Does Wales Need Them?


So just who are 'the crachach'?



By Carolyn Hitt 
Journalist and broadcaster
Coastal path in north Pembrokeshire
The Crachach: Weekend retreats in Pembrokeshire...
They are the elite who look after one another - the powerful, great and good of Wales. Somehow the Senedd opening just would not be the same without their presence - the crachach.So with tongue firmly embedded in cheek, social commentator Carolyn Hitt ponders the status of crachach in today's Wales.


So what does it mean to be crachach in modern Wales?
In an outrageous slur on my character, I was once accused of being valleys crachach because I grew up in a house with bay windows and my parents had a three- piece suite from Leekes.
But Rhondda was never a hotbed of crachach society.
The term used to denote local gentry but 21st century crachach is the Taffia, the largely Welsh-speaking elite who dominate the arts, culture and media of Wales and to a lesser extent its political life.
Rhodri Morgan reckons there's no place for stuck-up sorts down the Bay. "Cynulliad y werin, nid Cynulliad y crachach," as he once famously declared - "An assembly of the people, not an assembly of the establishment".



Eisteddfod
If in desperate need, they can usually be spotted here...

But the crachach just think most assembly members are a bit thick. See the recent Arts Council of Wales rumpus for details.
You don't necessarily have to be rich to be crachach, a direct bloodline to writer Saunders Lewis will do nicely.
Their natural habitat can range from the Gorsedd of the Eisteddfod to a Welsh National Opera opening night. They have their names inscribed on chairs in the Wales Millennium Centre and take over Tier One of St David's Hall.
They are never short of a committee to chair nor an international rugby ticket complete with canapés at half-time.



 If the crachach had a coat of arms, the motto would be that old chestnut: 'It's who you know not what you know and make sure you're belonging to someone on the committee' 

The Vale, Pontcanna and Whitchurch are crachach property hotspots while barn conversions in Llandeilo and cottages in Newport, Pembrokeshire, provide weekend retreats.
Supremely confident in all social situations, you can spot them by their habit of looking over your left shoulder as they scan the room for someone more important than you to talk to.
While they may be vicious about each other in private they rarely fall out publicly unless they are fighting for position in the queue for the latest Kyffin Williams exhibition.

Older crachach can be fiercely Welsh nationalist yet not averse to receiving gongs from the Queen. Younger arty crachach will always get their projects funded, however rubbish they may be.
Media crachach are perhaps the most obnoxious members of the species, especially when misbehaving at the crachach bacchanalian extravaganza that is the Bafta Cymru Awards.
Crachach society is not a meritocracy. If the crachach had a coat of arms, the motto would be that old chestnut: 'It's who you know not what you know and make sure you're belonging to someone on the committee', albeit written in medieval Welsh in cynghanedd metre.

Answer:

Yes....................
No.....................
I'm one of them!

Wednesday, 3 February 2010

Home Is Where The Heart Is

Come all ye young rebels, and list while I sing,
For the love of one's country is a terrible thing.
It banishes fear with the speed of a flame,
And it makes us all part of the patriot game.



Dominic Behan


Turning away from politics and the recession for a while, let us consider other matters no less relevant to our lives, yet to a large degree ignored particularly by those concerned with purely materialistic issues.


It appears that many people in England, for example, do not exhibit the same love of country as the Celtic peoples, those of Ireland, Scotland and Wales. There is a word in Welsh - "hiraeth" which expresses this feeling succinctly and it is loosely translated as "longing", yet it is more than that. It could be described as a deep, inexpressible yearning of the spirit, especially for those who are separated from the land which they call their own and regard as "home".


In such people it is often revealed as a desire to free their country from a foreign yoke, yet it has more than political connotations. It is a love of the land and its customs, its landscapes and its vistas. It seems that Britain does not evoke such feelings to the extent that "England" does - the England of William Blake. Similarly Britain does not evoke the hiraeth of the Welsh (and Cornish), expressed in the national anthems of Wales and Brittany - Land of My Fathers. Try to make a comparison with the British anthem which many regard as a dirge rather than a song of inspiration.


The difference is the Britain is a state - Cymru, Alba, Eire..... are nations, and it is nations which bring out the feelings of group consciousness and shared identity. It is these feelings which inspire nationalism, and this -ism is more than a political movement. It is a cause, a cause which leads to freedom and self-expression in national institutions and the revival of traditions and community life. It is something worth fighting for, and many have fallen in bringing its achievement to fruition. Those who scorn and ridicule the aspirations of nationalists and freedom fighters and imply that they are somewhat soft in the head do not have the spirit or the vision, or the love of country, which can galvanise a nation and a people to greatness.


alanindyfed


Politics is never far away: extract from a letter to Mr Brown



Yesterday in a speech titled ‘Transforming Politics’, you said that you would ‘do all that is necessary to restore trust’ in politics and the conduct of MPs. If you wish to restore trust in politics, you should stop treating people like fools by claiming that you were unaware of this fund when all the evidence points to the contrary. I therefore urge you to admit to this fund’s existence, apologise for misleading the House and co-operate with any inquiries that John Lyon may wish to make.
Yours sincerely,
Eric Pickles
Chairman, The Conservative Party


Read the full text of the letter HERE



SNP health Minister Shona Robison said:
"We're committed to scrapping prescription charges and removing this tax on ill-health, which hits those on low incomes hardest. We want our national health service to be restored to its founding principles - free at the point of delivery and based on clinical need, not ability to pay.

Tuesday, 2 February 2010

Violin Sue Aston Cornwall Home Coming Celtic Music Violin




Other News:


Sion Simons MP should be thoroughly ashamed of himself.
Yet he won't be.
These Labour politicians are notoriously thick-skinned!


See: http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2006/oct/13/egovernment.digitalmedia
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/politics/6044222.stm