Wednesday, 14 April 2010

A Realistic Prediction for the Election

The Election


The Conservative Party will win with a small working majority.


The Liberal Democrats will do better than everyone expects or polls suggest.


Smaller parties - the SNP, Plaid Cymru, the Greens, UKIP will do well.


Large numbers of the electorate, almost 50%,  will not cast their vote.


The fact is that the majority of people are disillusioned with all politicians and in particular those of the major parties, therefore they will abstain from voting or will cast a protest vote, benefiting independents and smaller parties.
There will be change but not major change. Whether Britain will have a fairer society remains to be seen.

Tuesday, 13 April 2010

A Celtic Alliance becomes a Reality


Plaid Cymru manifesto: aim to create a 'formidable bloc' of Celtic MPs

Welsh nationalists hope alliance with the SNP will lead to greater influence in a hung parliament
Plaid Cymru
Ieuan Wyn Jones, leader of Plaid Cymru, said the party would work to protect Wales against 'London cuts'. Photograph: Barry Batchelor/PA
Plaid Cymru today revealed a raft of manifesto pledges designed to tempt voters to help it create a "formidable bloc of Celtic MPs" that will wield influence during the next parliament.
The Welsh nationalists have formed an alliance with the Scottish National party that they believe will help them shape policy at Westminster if there is a hung parliament.
Plaid's leader, Ieuan Wyn Jones, said at the party's manifesto launch in Cardiff that Welsh and Scottish nationalists could form a "strong wedge" and force the next government to do more for their respective countries.
Future working arrangements did not stop Jones and his colleagues fiercely attacking Labour and the Conservatives. Jones accused Labour of mismanaging the economy and the Tories of being complicit in the errors made, adding that Plaid would work to protect Wales against "London cuts".
He spelled out policies that Plaid would talk to Labour or the Tories about in exchange for their support during the next parliament.
Plaid's first pledge focuses on the claim that the current funding formula leaves Wales shortchanged to the tune of £300m a year. This threatens frontline services such as hospitals and schools, it claims. Plaid also suggests the "London-centric focus" on the 2012 Olympic games is causing Welsh communities to lose out.
The manifesto (slogan: Think different. Think Plaid) argues pensioners are having to choose between "heating and eating" and says it would fight to substantially increase pensions, at first for the over-80s, later for all pensioners. It says this could be paid for by limiting income tax relief on pension contributions to the standard rate. The current system, it says, favours those earning more than £150,000 a year.
Plaid also says the next government should make the abolition of child poverty a priority. It says it wants the wealthy to pay "a little extra" to make sure vulnerable people are protected. It would introduce a new tax rate of 50% on those earning more than £100,000. It would also raise the personal tax allowance by £100, taking 1 million low earners out of the "income tax net".
The party also calls for a "maximum wage" to begin to close the "massive pay gap" between rich and poor, and for bank bonuses be curbed.
Plaid called the war in Iraq "illegal" and the conflict in Afghanistan "unwise", and says it wants a phased withdrawal of troops. It also calls for a "Military and Well-Being Act" to safeguard service personnel while they are fighting and afterwards.
The party says it wants to set up a venture capital fund to help smaller businesses in Wales get started. It pledges to improve access to broadband and boost mobile phone coverage. Plaid says it wants to bring high-speed rail to Wales and develop infrastructure for electric vehicles.
It is not calling for independence at once ‑ though this remains a long term goal ‑ but does want a referendum on giving the national assembly in Cardiff more powers. Plaid will also continue to campaign for a separate legal jurisdiction for Wales.
The party is calling for a halt to "unnecessary" spending such as on the ID card scheme and the replacement of the Trident nuclear weapons system.
Other eye-catching proposals include a cut in VAT to 5% on home maintenance, repairs and improvements. It also wants a reform of the Allotment Act to cope with demand.
Jones refused to be drawn on which of the main parties he would prefer to see gain power. Plaid won three seats at the last general election and Jones said the party would get more of the 40 it is fighting for this time.
Jones said Plaid and the SNP had worked closely together to maximise their chances of winning influence. He pointed out that Plaid had experience working with other parties: it has formed a coalition government with Labour at the assembly and works with the Liberal Democrats on Cardiff council. To the concern of some activists, the leadership has confirmed it will also talk to the Tories.
Jones said Plaid and the SNP could create a "formidable bloc of Celtic MPs".
Plaid's leader at Westminster, Elfyn Llwyd, said the party had punched above its weight before and with more MPs would be able to "punch even more".

Alex Salmond's Fight Back on Media Block





SNP leader and First Minister Alex Salmond is to pre-empt the first
leaders' debate of the campaign with a UK-wide election broadcast.

The SNP have replaced a planned party election broadcast - scheduled for screening just before Thursday's first leaders' debate on ITV - with a specially recorded address which will take the SNP's alternative message to the cuts agenda of the London parties into homes across the whole of the UK.

Mr Salmond will use the broadcast to challenge what he will brand the "cosy Westminster consensus" on budget cuts which the Labour, Tory and Lib Dem leaders will all agree on during the ITV debate.

He will say that the broadcasters should have ensured a "real debate, with all political voices" in order to offer viewers an alternative to the "Metropolitan machine" politics of the London parties.

Predicting a "long-winded debate about English health, crime and schools", Mr Salmond will also point out that the debate will be largely irrelevant to a Scottish audience.

Previewing the party election broadcast, Mr Salmond said:

"Broadcasters sometimes trail their programmes by saying they can be seen 'except for viewers in Scotland'. In the same way, this leaders' debate is being directed at the electorate - except for viewers in Scotland.

"The so-called domestic issues which will be debated - things like health, education and policing - are all controlled in Scotland by Holyrood. As such this discussion will be totally meaningless to viewers in Scotland.

"The broadcasters have ensured Scotland's voice is not being properly heard in the leaders' debates. But our special party election broadcast will take our message to people right across the UK. And for those watching in Scotland, it will let them know there is a real alternative to the decade of despair threatened by the London parties - and that alternative is voting SNP on May 6th for local and national champions."

Note:

The Party election broadcast will be screened at the following times on Thursday evening - all before the ITV leaders' debate begins at 8.30pm:

BBC 1 Scotland 18:55
BBC2 Scotland 17:55
STV 18:25
Channel 4: 19:55 (UK-wide)
Channel 5: 19:25 (UK-wide)


Now read this....http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2010/apr/04/kevin-mckenna-alex-salmond

Monday, 12 April 2010

Power to the Scottish People

Speaking after the SNP's campaign launch in Edinburgh today (Monday) the party leader and First Minister of Scotland, Alex Salmond MSP, said SNP candidates in the Westminster election will make a Community Commitment to guarantee accessibility, accountability and openness to their constituents.

SNP MPs already have a strong record of openness and accountability with the party’s MPs among the 10 hardest working MPs in the last parliament. John Mason – who was only elected in 2008 – has a work rate that exceeds 24 MPs from the other parties who were elected in 2005.

Launching the campaign in Edinburgh today SNP leader and First Minister Alex Salmond said:

“The House of Commons is now held in widespread disrepute. The best remedy is to offer a different style of MP. Local champions whose mission is to articulate community concerns.

“Every SNP candidate will sign a pledge of accessibility, accountability and openness on issues like expenses – it will be their Community Commitment.

“It will be their guarantee, their contract with the voters and it will set the standard for their work on behalf of the people they represent. SNP MPs will not go to London to settle in – they will be at Westminster to be their community's voice – their community's champion.”

Sunday, 11 April 2010

Scaremongering is an Act of Desperation

Resorting to scaremongering tactics is a notorious and unwelcome development as the general election nears, but it is not surprising that the party which employs such negative campaigning is acting true to type. As these tactics are revealed the public will only grow even more outraged and they will doubtless yet again backfire on the perpetrators.


Sunday, 11th April 2010

Dirtier tactics

PETER HOSKIN 10:21am
I think we all expected this election campaign to be fought a few inches below the belt.  But, as Iain Dale and Dizzy say, Labour's tactic of mailing scaremongering leaflets to cancer sufferers is some new kind of low.  I mean, just imagine how it would feel to receive, as a cancer patient or an immediate family member, a leaflet which politicises the problem to the point of suggesting that your care would be jeapordised by voting for another party.  And then imagine how it would feel if you have been specifically targeted because of your connections with the illness, as seems to have been the case here.  Well, it defies belief that this is how the party of government is going about "restoring trust in our broken politics," or whatever they say.  This goes well beyond any acceptable level of campaign rough and tumble.
Labour now, of course, have questions to answer about how they've targetted cancer sufferers with this campaign.  So far, they claim that they've used public data in a kind of scattershot approach – but Dizzy points out in a second update to his post that there may be "more to this than meets the eye".  And then there's the case of Diane Dwelly, a breast cancer survivor, whose image and words are used on the leaflet.  As the Times puts it:
"This weekend Dwelly, 48, from Rugby, admitted she had 'probably been used by Labour'. She believed her photograph had been taken for use in a magazine for the National Health Service, not as part of Labour’s election campaign."
If so, then this story has a while left to run yet.  And, at the very least, it's unlikely that these leaflets will cross any more letterboxes for the rest of the campaign.

And in Scotland......




Labour claim:

"The SNP are getting rid of my free bus pass."
SNP say: "Labour scaremongering at its worst"

Background:

The Scotland-wide Free Bus Travel Scheme for Older and Disabled People was introduced on 1 April 2006. The scheme provides free bus travel anywhere in Scotland on local buses and long distance scheduled coaches throughout the day, including the morning rush hour. Two free return ferry journeys per year to the mainland are also offered as a minimum to all eligible Scottish Island residents.
The scheme has over 1.1 million National Entitlement Cardholders.
A review of the scheme this year looked at eligibility, delivery, legislation and funding.

The truth:

  • There will be no reduction in this service.
  • Pensioners and disabled people will continue to enjoy free travel across Scotland at all times.
  • The fact is that the Scottish Government is extending the scheme. Injured military veterans will also now qualify for free travel.
  • The SNP has increased support for bus travel with extra funding of £4m, £6m, £2m over this spending review
  • Funding for bus transport is 31% higher per capita in Scotland under the SNP than in England and Wales under Labour.
We are guaranteeing that the eligibility to free travel for elderly and disabled will not change – in relation to all other elements of the concessionary travel scheme we have no plans to change it.
Truth to the claim: 0%


And in Wales.....



Tories accuse Labour of tax credits scaremongering

THE Conservatives accused Labour of “pathetic scaremongering” over the future of tax credits today in the final session of Welsh questions before the General Election.
Labour sees the system – effectively offering top-ups to salaries to reward work and pay for child-care – as one of its main achievements in office, although critics say the process is excessively bureaucratic.
With the Treasury facing an annual deficit of £178bn, the Conservatives have suggested cutting benefits to those on joint incomes above £50,000 as one way of bringing down public spending.
Welsh Secretary Peter Hain told MPs: “Tax credits have made work pay and have lifted hundreds of thousands out of poverty. That’s why I resent the fact that a Tory sword of Damocles is hanging over on those on low and modest incomes in Wales.”
Mr Hain said 326,000 people in Wales have benefited from tax credits.
But Conservative MP for Preseli Pembrokeshire Stephen Crabb said that instead of “pathetic scaremongering on tax credits” Mr Hain should address Labour’s record in Government.
“After 13 years of this sorry Government, almost exactly one quarter of the working age population in Wales is economically inactive, out of work, doing nothing,” said Mr Crabb. “That’s a shameful record.”
Plaid Cymru Parliamentary leader Elfyn Llwyd and Liberal Democrat Roger Williams called for an increase in the personal tax allowance. The move would achieve many of the same aims as tax credits without the bureaucracy, they argued.
During the 30-minute session several questions came from MPs retiring at the General Election, including Labour’s Don Touhig (Islwyn), Betty Williams (Conwy) and Martyn Jones (Clwyd South) and Plaid Cymru MP for Camarthen East and Dinefwr Adam Price.

A New Proposal for Democracy and Fairness

An alliance between four parties: the SNP, Plaid Cymru, Sinn Fein and the Greens. This would be ideologically possible and sustainable.



A Cameron Conundrum

In a headline in the "Sunday Telegraph" David Cameron is quoted as saying " I am a one nation MP", and presumably he refers to the "British nation" as all unionists do. However, Cameron fails to realise that we are living in a British state composed of more than one nation, and to be credible what he should really declare is that he supports all the British nations, and not the contradictory notion of a supposed nation of Britain which does not exist as such, but only in the minds of some  politicians whose thinking  is devoid of a 21st Century progressive reality. And yes, he could talk about ending division between the "haves" and "have nots" in all the nations.

Friday, 9 April 2010

The Shamelessness of British Politics

Can anybody explain why one party, out of the three main British parties appears to contain within it, throughout all its ranks, the most unsavoury of politicians? This party is a party of denial, excuses, exonerations, fabrications, justifications, graft, spin and sleaze - and I am not referring to the Liberal Democrats, at least on this occasion! I suggest that people vote for a party with honesty, decency, integrity, credibility and respect, if one can be found, and one which takes notice of the views of the public, and is willing to put the public interest first.
Anybody who votes for the party in question is either blinkered or deluded.

Thursday, 8 April 2010

Tweedledum and Tweedledee


This is how Alex Salmond, Scotlands's First Minister, sums up the two contending leaders of the two main Unionist parties. There is little to choose between them, he contends. They both put the interests of the Union first, without much reference to Scotland and Wales or to the funding which both these nations need while they still remain part of the Union. The main difference between the major parties is the fact that Labour emphasise state control and bureaucratic centralisation and the Conservatives prefer freedom of choice and more personal liberty. The Liberals claim to be the true party of change and fairness in society but remain shy of coming out in favour of constitutional change apart from changing the voting system in their favour.

Thus, for the people of Wales and Scotland this election has little relevance to their real needs, with the choice falling between Tweedledum and Tweedledee, neither of whom will bring much benefit to the nations of the perimeter. England will swing to the right, while Scotland and Wales remain traditionally left of centre. Yet these two resurgent nations do have another choice and that is to back the nationalist cause and sever the links which bind them to a corrosive and failing union. In the event of a Hung Parliament their MPs could win concessions which Tweedledum and Tweedledee are loathe to contemplate in a political process which has yet to run  its course..

Your Equality or Mine?



Scotland and England, completely united in 1707, was a union of equal sovereign nations under one monarch and it soon transpired that the condition of equality had little meaning as England, or Great Britain as the merger was named, exercised control over Scottish Affairs. It is only recently that the Scottish Parliament has been restored to the people of Scotland. The disbandment of the clan system, the banning of the wearing of the tartan and the enclosure of lands were all decided and enforced by the government in London and Scotland became a virtual colony of England ruled by London. Even the Stone of Scone on which the Scottish kings had been crowned was taken to London as a symbol of British dominance over its neighbour to the north.

Despite the efforts of the British government to dismantle the structure of a separate Scottish state and destroy the unique culture of Scottish society, along with the connivance of elements of the Scottish gentry, the spirit of nationhood survived and now it has become a force to be respected and reckoned with. As in Ireland, the aspiration of Celtic peoples for autonomy and self-government cannot be stifled and in Scotland, Wales and Cornwall the movement towards a distinctive and separate national status with their own institutions and governments continued to gain momentum. The outcome will be the formation independent nation states, certainly in Ireland, Wales and Scotland, in the context of a European federation of nations.

Wednesday, 7 April 2010

Scotland Rules the Waves


TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8346160e669e20133ec79cb66970b

The Election Will Be Won

The election will be won by those who realise that they can make a difference and are very aware of the urgency of change.

Tuesday, 6 April 2010

Scotland's Independence a Key Issue





SNP Leader and Scotland's First Minister Alex Salmond took to the streets on  Day One of the General Election campaign, to meet voters in one of the SNP's top targets.  

Across the country, the SNP is to deliver half a million "MORE NATS LESS CUTS" campaign postcards by 6pm tonight, in time for the evening news bulletins.  

The SNP also highlighted the calling of the election on the anniversary of  the Declaration of Arbroath – Scotland’s Declaration of Independence, a key issue in the campaign.  

Visiting Portobello in the Edinburgh East constituency, Mr Salmond said:

"At this election, Scottish voters can elect local and national champions.  SNP MPs who will make sure Scotland's communities can't be ignored.

"Scotland needs champions now more than ever. The London parties offer  the same agenda - they are part of the same metropolitan, political machine.  

The London  parties have blown the gaff on their plans for Scotland.   By their own admission, Labour would cut ‘tougher and deeper’ than Thatcher, and the Tories are planning a  special cut for Scotland despite being funded by Scottish resources, blowing their  respect agenda away.

"The SNP are going into this campaign with a clear message for Scottish voters: more votes means more Nats, and more Nats means less cuts. The Westminster system is discredited, and only  SNP champions can protect and promote Scotland’s interests.  

“We can protect jobs, recovery and important local services and instead cut  things like the £100,000 million replacement for Trident, identity cards, the  House of Lords or the Scotland Office.”

“And in calling the election on the anniversary of the Declaration of Arbroath, Scotland’s declaration of  independence, Labour have ensured that the London parties refusal to allow Scotland’s  voters a say over their country’s future will be an issue SNP champions will  bring to the fore. 

"On polling day the people of Scotland can do more than just vote for a politician, they can elect a local champion with the SNP.”

Unionist Labour is a Lost Cause

Labour faces tough sell in poll battleground 

With voters disgusted by sleaze allegations and political bickering, the Labour party has an uphill battle clinging to power in crucial parliamentary seats such as Crawley in southern England.Skip related content
The party has been in government for 13 years, but has only a tiny majority in the area, some 30 miles (50 km) south of London, one of several so-called marginal constituencies seen as decisive for the May 6 national vote.
"I can't think of anything worse than another five years of Labour ... Sleaze brought down the last Conservative government and it should have brought down this one," said health worker Lindsey Hales, 57, referring to Labour's main rival, the right-of-centre Conservative party.
Prime Minister Gordon Brown announced the election date on Tuesday, and like theConservatives before losing power in 1997, his party has been buffeted by a steady drip of stories alleging political misdeeds, such as peddling influence for money or inflating expense claims.
Few voters in Crawley, a busy commercial hub between London and the south coast, gave any positive reasons for voting, other than dislodging Labour.
"Get rid of the lot of them because they're diabolical," said one man on why he would vote, declining to be named.
The Conservatives, who have consistently led in opinion polls, have also been implicated by allegations of sleaze, but for many voters in Crawley, close to Gatwick airport, the mud has stuck to Labour.
Those more favourable to the party, or who have not yet decided how to vote, said they had seen few concrete policies from any side and had yet to be convinced.
"The economy and jobs are the most important issues, but I don't have a lot of faith in either of the main parties. The Liberal Democrats are probably the most sensible ... Labour is still an option," said insurance worker Kevin Fisher, 50, referring to the smaller party.
An Ipsos MORI poll commissioned by Reuters last month showed the Conservatives still lag Labour in the marginal constituencies they must win to secure a clear-cut election victory.
Campaigning is set to begin in earnest now the election has been called, and cutting Britain's massive budget deficit is expected to take centre stage.
Political parties have so far been coy in identifying where and how deeply they would cut spending.
"All the main parties are the same. Whoever gets in, will do the same thing, cut spending and bring taxes. They're not being open or honest enough about it," said an engineer of Sri Lankan origin, 35, who gave his name as Thusha.
Instead, voters said, parties had been busy scoring political points and bickering.
"I want lower taxes, less bullshit. They're just fighting with each other," said a man who declined to be named who works in a recruitment agency, adding that jobs had dried up.