Westminster isn’t working for Scotland and only independence can create a path to a fairer and more socially just country.
In a major report,
Yes to a Just Scotland, Yes Scotland says successive UK governments had failed to do something about the widening gap in inequality.
Its chief executive, Blair Jenkins, said: "The evidence of the past 30 years tells us that alternating Labour and Tory governments at Westminster will not create a social democratic Scotland and yet a 'No' will leave welfare and economic policy in Westminster’s hands."
The report is a direct response to the STUC’s call for both sides in the independence debate to set out their stalls on achieving a fairer Scotland made in its own report,
A Just Scotland, published last August.
Yes Scotland's report also marked the launch of a major campaign focusing specifically on why Scotland could and should be a fairer country.
Addressing an audience of trade unionists, voluntary sector workers and students at the launch in Glasgow, Mr Jenkins said it was clear independence offered the best opportunity of creating the kind of prosperous and socially just nation most Scots wanted.
"It is becoming increasingly clear that Westminster isn’t working for Scotland and we need a change of direction. This isn’t about one government or one parliamentary term, but about an economic and social path that has been followed for more than 30 years now, with changes of government resulting only in a change of pace rather than a change of policy direction."
Mr Jenkins said investment in and around London had been deemed most economically efficient and this had led to a growing economic imbalance across the UK.
"In terms of social and economic cohesion, the Westminster system is breaking up Britain," he said. "Westminster policy is targeting the most vulnerable in our society. Welfare changes are pushing more and more families into financial hardship and austerity, as an economic policy, is consigning thousands of Scots to unnecessary unemployment or under employment."
He said the UK was already the fourth most unequal society in the developed world and was on track to become the most unequal. Scotland, he said, was being taken down the wrong path.
"Independence is about having the ability to choose a different future for Scotland. It is about being able to make Scotland the sort of country we want it to be: we believe the consensus in Scotland means a Scottish government will do more to build a more caring society – a nation that feels more like a community."
The report says that Scotland has both the wealth and the will to become a fairer country and that creating more social justice goes hand-in-glove with a thriving, vibrant economy.
It says: "Too often policies that are designed to promote social justice and tackle inequalities are seen as inconsistent with policies that promote economic growth."
Leading economists, including two Nobel laureates who are members of the Scottish Government's Fiscal Commission Working Group, argue that countries which are most equal are best placed to boost sustainable growth.
The report continues: "We are fortunate in Scotland that there is a different balance of consensus around issues of social justice and social democracy - a consensus held by citizens, civic groups and organisations, as well as political parties, and indeed by some of our most successful entrepreneurs. With independence we can create a virtuous cycle of enterprise and compassion whereby jobs and investment create growth, helping to deliver a more equal and caring society."
Among a series of proposals in the report,
Yes Scotland calls on the STUC to urge all political parties to spell out how they would create a more socially just country in the event of a Yes vote in the independence referendum. It says people need to know before the autumn of 2014 what specific policies parties had for tackling growing inequality and to develop a fuller understanding of what independence will mean in other areas beyond the starting point that will be set out by the Scottish Government in its independence white paper.
The report also invites the STUC to:
Mr Jenkins said: "This is a very detailed report which we believe will help inform the constitutional debate and act as a platform for wider discussion among the trade union movement, other sectoral groups and the people of Scotland themselves.
"We believe that if social justice is at the heart of the independence debate and is a substantial part of the reason why Scotland chooses independence, then the delivery of social justice will, as a consequence, become an essential part of the early independence years."
Actress and leading independence campaigner Elaine C Smith, a member of Yes Scotland’s advisory board, hosted the launch of the report.
She said: "If we don't embrace the inequalities in our country and face up to the harsh realities of so many people's lives, then we are not doing our job either in the Yes campaign or as a nation."As part of its focus on fairness, Yes Scotland will this weekend launch a major information and leafleting campaign to highlight how prosperity and social justice are mutually reinforcing and how both elements are more readily achievable in an independent Scotland.
This weekend and over the next few weeks, through its nationwide network of local and special interest groups, Yes Scotland volunteers will be taking the fairness campaign into communities across the country.
And a very happy new year and Hogmanay for Scotland (or Alba) with everyone in the country looking forward with great expectations for a positive vote for (or against) Independence. But this vote is not just a chance in a lifetime. It is a chance in a millenium, for the people of Scotland to prove to the rest of the world that they are an individual and proud and dignified nation and not merely an adjunct of the UK, as Wales and northern Ireland are, under the control of an unrepresentative British parliament in London. This year presents a new and unprecedented opportunity for the people of Scotland to cast a vote for the future of a nation and to contradict the action of their King James VI who, along with others, turned his back on his Scottish birthright to adopt the culture and mannerisms of the English and so virtually became King of England without the consensus of the Scottish population who then had no access to democratic process.
But in our present age that democratic process exists, however flawed it is, and the people of Scotland can choose their allegiance. Will they give their allegiance to a united kingdom where real values are being lost and where they have no democratic political representation, and where elements of totalitarianism and lack of human rights prevails in a divided society, where the gap continues to increase between the rich and the poor, or will they choose the dignity of independence and a respected place in the community of nations?
