The Irreconcilable opposition of SNP to CFI lobby as well as Trident
By Anthony Bellchambers
May 10, 2015 "Information Clearing House" - "GR" - A future Little Britain: separated from Scotland, subservient to America, outside the European Union and beholden to the conflicting agendas of the Conservative Friends of Israel (CFI) lobby and the SNP is a frightening prospect.
A government expenditure of £100 billion to replace the Trident
nuclear deterrent would be about as protective to Britain as writing a powerful
computer virus which if used would permanently damage our own entire
communications infrastructure leaving all state security systems disabled. The
Trident weapon of mass destruction has no legitimate purpose: its use would be
impossible as huge numbers of civilians, including millions of British citizens,
would be unavoidable victims.
The plain facts are that: ‘international terrorism, cyber-attacks and natural hazards as greater threats than nuclear war. The cost of replacing Trident would be enough to fully fund A&E services in UK for 40 years, employ 150,000 new nurses, build 1.5 million affordable homes, build 30,000 new primary schools, or cover tuition fees for 4 million students.’ The Trident so-called deterrent is for status reasons only. It should be scrapped and Britain’s defence infrastructure should be rebuilt without nuclear or chemical weapons of mass destruction and without any collaboration from Israeli-owned arms suppliers. Britain’s defence should not be compromised by the use of equipment sourced from outside the EU or NATO. To do so, potentially places us, in Britain, all in danger in the event of any future conflict. The Conservative government’s current defence policy is dangerously flawed and with an isolated Britain divorced from Scotland and outside the EU – would be an easy target for international terrorism. Copyright © Anthony Bellchambers, Global Research, 2015 |
No comments:
Post a Comment