| Can you help Tomorrow's Wales in supporting a Yes Campaign? |
 |
The official campaign period for the referendum on greater powers for the Assemby is about to start. It's hoped that the Referendum Order will be approved by the Privy Council on the 15th December with the official campaign starting on the 16th December. In order to be ready amd prepared for this intensive campaign period Cymru Yfory Tomorrow's Wales is praparing a database of volunteers for the Yes campaign. If you are ready to give practical help with the YES campaign would you be so kind as to reply to this email noting what you could do during the campaign: Name: Address: Post Code: Phone Number: Mobile Number: Leaflet distribution Phone canvassing Writing to the press: Organising a meeting: Other: Thanking you for your support, Elin Wyn Thank you for your continued interest in Tomorrow’s Wales. If you'd rather not receive our newsletter, write tocymruyfory@stratamatrix.co.uk and type 'no thanks' in the Subject line. |
Mr Woolas was accused of fighting a 'dirty and dishonest' campaign full of 'lies, smears and totally false allegations' Photo: GETTY
Mr Justice Teare said: "In an election address entitled The Examiner, the respondent (Mr Woolas) made a statement of fact, the meaning of which was that the petitioner attempted to woo, that is to seek, the electoral support of Muslims who advocated violence, in particular violence to the respondent.
"In a further election address entitled Labour Rose, he made a statement of fact the meaning of which was that the petitioner had refused to condemn extremists who advocated violence against the respondent.
"We have concluded that both of these statements, although made in the context of an election and said to arise from a political position adopted by the petitioner, were in relation to the petitioner's personal character or conduct.
"In our judgment to say that a person has sought the electoral support of persons who advocate extreme violence, in particular to his personal opponent, clearly attacks his personal character or conduct.
"It suggests that he is willing to condone threats of violence in pursuit of personal advantage.
"Having considered the evidence which was adduced in court we are sure that these statements were untrue. We are also sure that the respondent had no reasonable grounds for believing them to be true and did not believe them to be true.
"We also found that (in) an earlier election address the respondent had made a statement in fact, namely, that the petitioner had reneged on his promise to live in the constituency. This too, although made in the context of an election and said to arise from a statement made by the petitioner as a candidate in that election, was in relation to his personal character or conduct.
"It suggests that he is untrustworthy. The statement was false and the respondent had no reasonable ground for believing it to be true and did not believe it to be true.
"It follows in our judgment that the respondent is guilty of an illegal practice, contrary to section 136 of the Representation of the People Act 1983 with regard to those statements."
He concluded: "The consequence of our finding that the respondent is guilty of an illegal practice with regard to the statements we have referred to is that, pursuant to section 159(1) of the Act, his election as Member of Parliament for the constituency of Oldham East and Saddleworth is void and we have so reported to the Speaker of the House of Commons.
"We are satisfied that the statutory penalties for the illegal practices committed by the respondent are both necessary and proportionate, having regard to the seriousness of the statements made with regard to the petitioner's alleged attitude to the Muslim extremists who advocated violence."
The judges made no reference to the sanctions on Mr Woolas, although it is thought he could be barred from public office for a period of time.
From the Daily Mail
